Weigh in on the Desirable Properties
If you represent Mass General Birigham, confirm the source URLs, then open the Desirable Properties tab and leave a patch idea where the property text misses what your public work already argues.
These directions are generated from Mass General Birigham's public corpus, not from private landing pads. Each one is a hypothesis. Follow the interest that feels like your work. The Hermes prompt and Discuss link are real contribution paths, not a brochure.
DP8 · hypothesis
Collaborative Environment and Meta-Communities
Your stated mission ("Research and Innovation | Mass General Brigham false Research and Innovation Mass General Brigham is helping improve patient care through research and discovery.") sits next to DP8's human issue: Online communities constantly restart. Guiding question: How do communities persist beyond platforms?
Direction to explore
How do Alliance members share a collaboration space without collapsing into one platform community?
Candidate patch idea
Define meta-communities as optional shared rooms with explicit consent, not an ambient social network that harvests the Alliance listserv.
DP20 · hypothesis
Community Ownership
Your stated mission ("Research and Innovation | Mass General Brigham false Research and Innovation Mass General Brigham is helping improve patient care through research and discovery.") sits next to DP20's human issue: Platforms own everything users create. Guiding question: Who should own the next layer of the Internet?
Direction to explore
This is the anti-capture test: can Mass General Birigham's coordination space stay owned by people if commercial players arrive later?
Candidate patch idea
Strengthen anti-capture language: community rules and exit rights are written before large commercial platforms are invited to play.
DP10 · hypothesis
Education
Your stated mission ("Research and Innovation | Mass General Brigham false Research and Innovation Mass General Brigham is helping improve patient care through research and discovery.") sits next to DP10's human issue: Information overload. Guiding question: How do we learn continuously without drowning in fragmented information?
Direction to explore
What should researchers and fellows be invited to teach or contest in the DP corpus?
Candidate patch idea
Add that educational onboarding must show the live patch trail, not only a finished property statement.
DP22 · hypothesis
Civic Memory & Epistemic Continuity
Your stated mission ("Research and Innovation | Mass General Brigham false Research and Innovation Mass General Brigham is helping improve patient care through research and discovery.") sits next to DP22's human issue: Society keeps repeating the same debates. Guiding question: How do we preserve collective understanding without creating centralized truth?
Direction to explore
What civic memory should Alliance research leave so later members can see why a property changed?
Candidate patch idea
Require that contested summaries of Alliance public work remain linked to original-language sources.
DP14 · hypothesis
Trust and Transparency
Your stated mission ("Research and Innovation | Mass General Brigham false Research and Innovation Mass General Brigham is helping improve patient care through research and discovery.") sits next to DP14's human issue: Misinformation, propaganda, and deepfakes. Guiding question: How do we rebuild trust in an AI-powered Internet?
Direction to explore
How should Mass General Birigham show when Hermes inferred from public pages versus when a human confirmed?
Candidate patch idea
Require provenance on AI-assisted governance artifacts: source URLs, confirmations, and remaining hypotheses.
DP12 · hypothesis
Community-based AI Governance
Your stated mission ("Research and Innovation | Mass General Brigham false Research and Innovation Mass General Brigham is helping improve patient care through research and discovery.") sits next to DP12's human issue: AI rules decided by companies. Guiding question: Who should decide how AI behaves in our communities?
Direction to explore
Who ratifies AI-assisted policy when Institute, Labs, and Alliance members disagree?
Candidate patch idea
Bound AI assistance so communities can reject a draft without losing the human deliberation record.
